🔗 Share this article

Protesters gathered outside the legislative building this week

The Baltic nation's parliament members have voted to withdraw from an international accord created to safeguard women from abuse, covering family violence, following prolonged and intense debates in the legislature.

Thousands of protesters assembled in Riga this week to voice disagreement with the decision. The ultimate decision now rests with President Edgars Rinkevics, who must decide whether to approve or reject the legislation.

Referred to as the European treaty, the international accord only took effect in the Baltic state last year, mandating authorities to develop laws and support services to end all forms of violence.

The Baltic nation has become the first EU country to initiate the procedure of withdrawing from the convention. Turkey withdrew in two years ago, a move that human rights organizations described as a significant regression for gender equality.

Political Controversy and Opposition

The international agreement was approved by the European Union in 2023, yet conservative groups have contended that its emphasis on equal rights weakens traditional families and promotes what they term "gender ideology".

Following a lengthy debate in the Latvian parliament, lawmakers voted by a margin of 56-32 to withdraw from the treaty, a move sponsored by political opponents but supported by representatives from one of the three coalition parties.

The result represents a defeat for moderate conservative Prime Minister the nation's PM, who joined demonstrators outside the legislature earlier this seven-day period. "We refuse to give up, we will persist in our struggle so that abuse does not triumph," she declared to the assembly.

Ideological Disagreements and Reactions

One of the main political groups supporting the withdrawal is a nationalist party, whose head has urged citizens to choose between what he terms a "traditional family unit" and "non-binary concepts with multiple sexes".

Latvia's human rights commissioner the rights official urged the treaty not to be politicized, while the group Equality Now asserted it was "not a danger to Latvian values, it served as a tool to realize them".

The recent decision has provoked broad outcry both within Latvia and abroad.

Twenty-two thousand people have endorsed a Latvian appeal calling for the convention to be preserved. The women's rights organization Centrs Marta has called a protest for the coming week, accusing lawmakers of disregarding the will of the Latvian people.

International Worries and Potential Next Steps

The head of the European organization's parliamentary assembly stated that Latvia had made a hasty choice fueled by false information. He characterized it as an "unprecedented and extremely worrying step backward for women's rights and human rights in Europe".

He noted that since the transcontinental nation left the treaty in 2021, cases of femicide and abuse targeting females had risen sharply.

Because the decision did not secure a two-thirds support, the president could potentially send back the bill for additional review if he holds concerns.

President Rinkevics stated on digital platforms that he would assess the decision according to constitutional principles, "considering state and legal considerations, instead of belief-based perspectives".

Last week, another member of the governing alliance, the reformist party, suggested it would not exclude appealing to the Constitutional Court.

"This decision represents a concerning development for women's rights not only in Latvia but throughout the continent," stated a human rights activist.

• Domestic abuse statistics have been rising in several European nations
• The Istanbul Convention mandates specific legal protections for survivors of domestic abuse
• The nation's decision could influence similar discussions in additional EU countries